It has become clear that the book is more of a social artifact than ever. The point-in-time contents inside a black-box container has been unfurled into a stream, an ever-changing conversation around the book, what it means, and why it matters. Time itself starts to become an essential ingredient in the writing — when and how often you engage influences your experience as much as the text itself.
What you are really sharing is a collective conversation, the cumulative strata of many layers of marginalia built up through the skillful application of attention. By connecting these small, local networks forming around each book, we could eventually create a single networked literature. Such a macronetwork would allow us to trace the source of any idea, concept, or influence through time. Streams are powerful, but they underestimate the value that humans place on tangible artifacts.
This is true more broadly of all things digital. Data gets lost, devices get stolen, and photos and songs get trapped in obsolete formats. The blessing of digital reading is also its curse — it is traceless. What came of those hours of precious attention we spent immersed in the mind of another?
What did we take away from the experience, besides a warm fuzzy feeling of edutainment? The hunger for artifacts will ensure that printed books continue to survive far into the future, and other more whimsical efforts like Bookcubes can help fill in the gaps.
But the more fundamental need to take away something tangible from the experience of reading is one of the things driving the return of commonplace books — personal, curated collections of facts, insights, musings, quotes, and research originally invented in 19th century Europe, as a way to deal with the information explosion of the Industrial Era.
One searchable, always accessible, easily shared and embedded amongst the digital text we consume. An evocation — the application of heat to the secret lemon juice letter — of our shared telepathy.
Considering all these major changes, I believe that books will endure. The field of technical writing has long offered a solution: single-source databases with multiple output capability.
This is exactly how the internet works: Yelp keeps all its data in a database, whose contents can be served up to any number of devices in just the right size and shape desired. The risk of not publishing content in open, accessible formats will grow as the number of opportunities for reuse grows. A book is complete in the sense that it contains its own beginning, middle, and end. This definition starts to boil it down to its essence: a book is now best understood as a concentrated unit of attention.
Facts are useful, ideas are interesting, and arguments are important, but only a story is unforgettable, life-changing even. To the extent that the grand challenges of our time require us to come to mutual understanding, and I believe they absolutely do, the book will endure as the minimum amount of concentrated attention required to become immersed in a story.
What a book transmits is not just information, but imagination. By crystallizing our ideas in the form of text, they take on a form that can survive years, decades, even centuries. Books free us from the bounds of time, like interstellar spaceships prepared to travel light years to find a suitable home. I drew heavily on these sources for this article, but the ideas got too intermixed and intermingled to cite directly in the text:.
Microsoft was slower to move initially but eventually started selling its software online as most software producers had been doing so well before. Netflix, Amazon, Microsoft, and a host of other producers changed tack, with the one holdout being Apple iTunes. While the market has been evolving, changing, and adapting, books and ebooks have been a little stuck in the mud.
Amazon took advantage of this intransigence and carved out a monopoly for itself. It has been built on the back of their invention of the self-publishing model.
Authors willingly, happily, and enthusiastically took advantage of the ability to publish, first in print-on-demand paperback, and then a little later in ebook. It used them to put pressure on, and then fight the Big Six publishers for dominance in the publishing market. Some bemoan the market dominance of Amazon. But it is worth remembering that Amazon innovated, changed, adapted, took risks, invested, and looked to the future and not the past. It will be those in the market who adapt that will survive and profit.
The adage of adapt or die is certainly fitting. But it is only available to authors or publishers who agree to give Amazon exclusivity for their digital books in the KDP Select program. For many, this exclusivity is a bad thing. But having built its position of total market dominance, Amazon has the right to make its own rules. It only asks for the exclusivity to sell, and then it is only for a period of three months. It is enough, though, for Amazon to keep its war chest of 1,, or more ebooks available for Kindle Unlimited subscribers.
Subscription services have already started with Amazon and others, and there will surely be more jumping into this model by necessity. Another model that has worked well with apps, in particular, is the revenue model supported by advertising. It has yet to find its feet in ebook sales. Are printed books really on the way out? Credit: Getty Images. Answers to these questions do not come easily, thanks to the variability in both e-reading trends and in research findings on the effects or lack thereof that digital reading has on us.
What we do know, according to a survey conducted last year by Pew Research, is that half of American adults now own a tablet or e-reader, and that three in 10 read an e-book in Although printed books remain the most popular means of reading, over the past decade e-books have made a valiant effort at catching up. In the s, Project Gutenberg began publishing electronic text files, and books written in HyperCard followed in the 80s and 90s, pioneered by companies such as Voyager and Eastgate Systems.
Printed books remain the most popular means of reading, but over the past decade e-books have made a valiant effort at catching up Credit: iStock. Almost immediately, the device began causing palpitations in the publishing industry. Adding fuel to the e-book fire, Nook debuted, as did the iPad, which was released alongside the iBooks Store. E-book readership has steadied over the past year Credit: iStock.
For the past two years, there has been a shift. For the other two they were only given seven minutes and for the last test they assumed they had no limit but were interrupted after seven minutes.
When the students predicted how they would do, those who were reading online generally predicted that they would have a lower score than those who made predictions before the read the articles on paper.
This is an immediate indicator that this could be a physiological issue rather than an actual one. If people believe they will do worse they generally will do so. Those who read the paper books did better on the tests with the time restricted and unrestricted time limits.
The interrupted readings led to similar scores with both online and paper readings. Another story conducted did not give the readers their personal choice, but instead they were assigned either a kindle or paperback to read. Fifty readers were told to read a short story by Elizabeth George, and then they were tested on different aspects of the short story.
The area that showed the greatest significance in results was the questions asking readers to put events in critical order.
This could be due to the fact that eBooks do not recreate an image in the same way that paperbacks do. When someone reads on a digital screen, is it more difficult to get an image in his or her head other than a screen?
Paper is a boring sight, which could make it easier to think about and picture what the author is portraying.
0コメント