Emi Kolawole contacts Dr. Ayyadurai and informs him that one of the two detractors wishes to make personal attacks and refers Dr. Ayyadurai by name. She admits she has relaxed the originally agreed upon ground rules and tells Dr. Chomsky do not want to participate in sensationalism and urges the Post to abide by the original ground rules.
During the first part of the Forum, Thorburn discusses the email controversy with the audience. This discussion is edited out from the final video that is posted on the MIT Website. After the event, Thorburn tells Dr. Ayyadurai that Dr. Ayyadurai was wronged, thanks Dr. Ayyadurai for his great job and promises to initiate corrective action on behalf of Dr. Ayyadurai, so the facts of his invention of email can come out publicly. To date Thorburn is yet to contact Dr.
The Washington Post sends a terse note that they have decided not to run Dr. Ayyadurai's and Prof. Chomsky's bylined articles. Only one of the detractors piece runs. Earlier the Post's editorial board had enthusiastically approved both Dr.
Chomsky's articles. Below is an email from one of the Post editors in reference to the bylined article of Dr. Ayyadurai which was approved. Hi Shiva - I think this is it. My senior editor read through the entire thing again and really liked it. He found your narrative compelling and graceful, and he's a tough skeptical audience.
Please read through the entire piece again. I made a few minor edits in the top for copy editing and accuracy. I know you are angry -- and rightfully so. The reflex to lash out is almost impossible to resist.
But I believe you resisted it successfully here. This piece showcases your attention to detail, determination and grace under fire with no trace of hyperbole or vitriol -- and it will win over your audience, showcasing a stark contrast to the personal attacks and name-calling that have dominated in the comments on the Post Web site and elsewhere online. Those who have resorted to snark and invective will not expect this. Regardless of whether they agree with your claims, I believe you come out the bigger man, as the saying goes and many will be forced to respect that.
I look forward to reading what everyone else writes, of course, but I have learned a great deal in working with you on this. I hope the process was rewarding for you as well. Cheers and have a great weekend! Tom Van Vleck, whose web site on the History of Email was earlier highly sarcastic of Tomlinson and exposed the fact that he did not invent email, began to conduct historical revisionism to drop sarcasm against Tomlinson and now present Tomlinson as "the inventor of email".
Ayyadurai receives an email, saying that his talk at EMBL in Germany on CytoSolve has been cancelled and he has been removed from the speaker line up. He asks for explanation and receives no response.
The President of the Sponsor company, which had agreed on January 11, to provide a substantial grant, sends a sudden email to Dr. Ayyadurai stating that they have received an anonymous email referencing the Gizmodo, Boston Innovation articles. The email states that Dr. Ayyadurai is a fraud, and imposter and brings to question his integrity.
Ayyadurai receives a notice from Sponsor indicating his credentials must be authenticated to show that he in fact has four degrees from MIT. The notice gives Dr. Ayyadurai less than 72 hours to respond or the grant will be cancelled.
Ayyadurai's attorney contacts Sponsor and informs him that this is insulting. Ayyadurai a note that his MIT Lectureship, which had been renewed for a period of 1-year Feb to Feb , must now been rescinded. No clear reasons are given. A colleague informs Dr. Ayyadurai that the Gizmodo news became too "politically expensive" for the Chairman to keep Dr. Ayyadurai on an as a Lecturer.
William Uricchio interrupts Dr. Ayyadurai's tutorial class, concerned about call from Boston Magazine reporter. Ayyadurai has not seen Uricchio for nearly a month. Ayyadurai expresses his deep dismay at how Uricchio has behaved in acquiescing to the yellow journalism of Gizmodo.
Uricchio's Civic Media group, ironically, gets funded by Knight Journalism Foundation to do research on bettering journalism. This article has little to do with email but more bent on simply discrediting Dr. Ayyadurai with false claims. This article appears to be a pre-emptive response to Boston Magazine's article due in late May The InternetHallofFame. Org website appears have been built in short order by Raisedeye Brow. Earlier Dr. Van Vleck has made other revisions to cast Tomlinson in a far better light than his earlier version displayed.
BBN has much to gain by continuing to misuse the term "email". Using false claims , industry insiders such as BBN and others believe that they can revise and alter history to ensure the facts of Dr. Ayyadurai's invention of email is discredited, so the public is confused into thinking that email existed prior to While the technology pioneers who created these systems should be heralded for their efforts, and given credit for their specific accomplishments and contributions, these early computer programs were clearly not email.
The early message transaction developments allowed one user to transact an electronic text message with another user. Such communication was command driven and hence was only used by technical people who knew how to craft the cryptic code to send a message between two people. This was electronic text messaging, and not an email system, a system of interlocking parts, each of which is essential for ordinary people to communicate effectively with one or many others, in an environment where different kinds of information must be shared memos, documents, files, etc.
Early electronic messaging systems allowed multiple users on one computer to leave each other messages, like a yellow sticky note.
One user could leave a message by appending that message to a file, that was owned and accessible by the user, similar to having a notepad where people write notes to each other at the bottom, as a way for multiple users of a time-sharing mainframe computer to communicate. The exact history is not clear. This capability was quickly extended to become network electronic messaging, allowing users to pass messages between different computers. The early history of network electronic messaging is equally unclear.
According to others, AUTODIN system may have been the first allowing electronic text messages to be transferred between users on different computers in , but it is possible the SAGE system had something similar some time before.
Early electronic messaging was just a small advance on what we know these days as a file directory - it just put a message in another user's directory in a spot where they could see it when they logged in simple as that. Just like leaving a note on someone's desk. So while electronic mail transactions via file transfers on a single computer and across a computers network electronic messaging existed before , they were hardly an email system, per the definition of email.
Many components, beyond just being able to transfer messages across computers were necessary to build an email system. Annotated Timeline of Electronic Text Messaging. Users passed messages using files on a central server. One user could log in to create a file and another user would open that file and read the message.
FTP sent a separate copy of each email to each recipient. International Center for Integrative Systems. All Rights Reserved. Follow on. Site Contributors Contact. Introduction I. Introduction Email is the direct translation of the interoffice, inter-organizational paper-based mail system. History of Components Necessary for the Invention of the First Email System - Several critical components, beyond the hardware infrastructure, were necessary for the invention of EMAIL, the first email system.
History of Attacks Against the Inventor of Email February 16, - April 30, A group of industry insiders have carried out a brutal attack against the inventor of email to protect vested interests. November 15, Dr. January 12, Boston Innovation writes a story on Dr. February 23, Gizmodo, owned by Gawker media, writes an article defaming Dr. March 2, Washington Post agrees to carry two bylined articles by Dr. March 5, Gizmodo publishes another article calling Dr. March 5 — March 30, A concerted effort is deployed by detractors of Ayyadurai on Wikipedia to defame and discredit him.
March 6, Boing Boing writes another defamatory and libelous article. March 14, David Crocker, one of Dr. The concept of sending another person a message through a computer was not invented by Tomlinson because computer scientists had been exchanging messages on machines for years. Yet these previous forms of electronic communication only allowed people to send messages to other users of the same computer or to numbered mailboxes where the messages had to be printed out.
Tomlinson wanted to send messages to people, not mailboxes, so he decided to modify and combine the programmes that were already out there. The telephone worked up to a point, but someone had to be there to receive the call.
That was the sort of mechanism you had to go through to leave a message, so everyone latched onto the idea that you could leave messages on the computer. But Tomlinson raised the usefulness of computers to such a new level that they soon became accessible for the mass public.
Tomlinson sent the first, history-making email to a computer that was in the same room as him so that he could check whether the software worked. Tomlinson also played a large role in developing the first email standards.
0コメント